old branches

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

old branches

ravas
Administrator
Is there any reason to keep the 1.0.0-Snapshot, quadratic and translation branches?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: old branches

dxli
Administrator
1.0.0-Snapshot is for the legacy 1.0 release, so let's keep it.

I will remove my leftovers :)
ravas wrote
Is there any reason to keep the 1.0.0-Snapshot, quadratic and translation branches?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: old branches

ravas
Administrator
Is there any reason to keep the 'translation' branch?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: old branches

R. van Twisk
Administrator
We can throw it away.

On Jul 8, 2016, at 9:38 PM, ravas [via LibreCAD] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Is there any reason to keep the 'translation' branch?


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.librecad.org/old-branches-tp5712961p5714048.html
To start a new topic under LibreCAD-dev, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from LibreCAD, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: old branches

ravas
Administrator
In reply to this post by ravas
What is the value of keeping the 1.0.0-Snapshot branch?
The latest commit is 9a2ab4b on Dec 15, 2013.

https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v1.0.4
was tagged on Sep 28, 2013,
but the latest commit is a81bbd4 on Jul 16, 2013

It seems like the name 1.0.0-Snapshot is misleading,
or the repository's early tags are.