goals and standards for the next release

I'm curious about what the goals are for the next release.
Considering Dongxu has fixed crashes that made 4 tools unusable,
I would say the nightly builds are far more stable.
We seem to be answering the majority of forum posts with "try the nightly build".

I really want to HD display issue be fixed before releasing 2.1.0

correct me, if I'm wrong. I think HD display can be handled automatically by Qt, if we don't fool Qt by: fixed icon sizes, incorrect layout/size policy, etc.

ravas wrote

I'm curious about what the goals are for the next release.
Considering Dongxu has fixed crashes that made 4 tools unusable,
I would say the nightly builds are far more stable.
We seem to be answering the majority of forum posts with "try the nightly build".

The other toolbar icons look equally small (img), and they are just normal toolbars. I think we will need the icon size option.

I'm noticing the icons (eg. undo & redo) are different in that screenshot. Are those from an older version?

ravas wrote

I'm noticing the icons (eg. undo & redo) are different in that screenshot. Are those from an older version?

Some of the icons are set to use desktop theme icons if available. Windows doesn't support this, but most Linux distros. What you see is the result, some like it and some hate it.

Armin

So ist das Leben...

do we get resolution-independence auto for a QMainWindow derived with ctor:

myMainWindow::myMainWindow():
QMainWindow(nullptr)
{
QToolBar* toolbar=new QToolBar(this);
QAction* action=new QAction(QIcon::fromTheme("document-open"));
toolbar->addAction(action);
addToolBar(toolbar);
}

LordOfBikes wrote

ravas wrote

I'm noticing the icons (eg. undo & redo) are different in that screenshot. Are those from an older version?

Some of the icons are set to use desktop theme icons if available. Windows doesn't support this, but most Linux distros. What you see is the result, some like it and some hate it.

Armin